Decision Making Under Ambiguity: A Belief-Function Perspective
نویسنده
چکیده
In this article, we discuss problems with probability theory in representing uncertainties encountered in the "real world" and show how belief functions can overcome these difficulties. Also, we discuss an expected utility approach of decision making under ambiguity using the belief function framework. In particular, we develop a proposition for decision making under ambiguity using the expected utility theory. This proposition is based on Strats approach of resolving ambiguity in the problem using belief functions. We use the proposition to explain the Ellsberg paradox and model the decision making behavior under ambiguity. We use the empirical data of Einhorn and Hogarth to validate the proposition. Also, we use the proposition to predict several decision making behaviors under ambiguity for special conditions. Furthermore, we discuss the general condition under which the switching behavior, as observed by Einhorn and Hogarth, will occur using the concept of precision measure in the expected utility theory.
منابع مشابه
Estimating Ambiguity
We propose a measure of the degree of ambiguity associated with a belief function and a nonparametric method to estimate it. The degree of ambiguity associated with a belief function is measured by the Kullback-Leibler diameter of the set of probability measures compatible with it. It is shown that an estimator based on the empirical version of the unambiguous measure generating the belief func...
متن کاملEnvironmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP)
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a utility theory based decision-making technique, which works on a premise that the decision-making of complex problems can be handled by structuring them into simple and comprehensible hierarchical structures. However, AHP involves human subjective evaluation, which introduces vagueness that necessitates the use of decision-making under uncertainty. The vagu...
متن کاملA decision theory for partially consonant belief functions
Partially consonant belief functions (pcb), studied by P. Walley, are the only class of Dempster-Shafer belief functions that are consistent with the likelihood principle of statistics. Structurally, the set of foci of a pcb is partitioned into non-overlapping groups and within each group, foci are nested. The pcb class includes both probability function and Zadeh’s possibility function as spec...
متن کاملSerotonin Transporter (5-HTTLPR) Genotype and Childhood Trauma are Associated with Individual Differences in Decision Making
The factors that influence individual differences in decision making are not yet fully characterized, but convergent evidence is accumulating that implicates serotonin (5-HT) system function. Therefore, both genes and environments that influence serotonin function are good candidates for association with risky decision making. In the present study we examined associations between common polymor...
متن کاملForthcoming in Management Science Ambiguity Aversion and the Preference for Established Brands
We propose that ambiguity aversion, as introduced in the literature on decision-making under uncertainty, drives a preference for established brands in multi-attribute choices among branded alternatives. Established brands are those for which belief in quality is held with greater confidence, even if specific attributes might be inferior to those of competing, less-established brands. In five e...
متن کامل